Former FIFA Referee Explains UEFA’s Stance on Julian Alvarez Penalty Controversy
The Champions League penalty controversy involving Julian Alvarez continues to spark debate after Atletico Madrid’s heartbreaking elimination against Real Madrid. Former FIFA referee Christina Unkel has provided insight into why UEFA remains hesitant to release complete details about the disputed decision.
Atletico Madrid suffered a painful exit from the Champions League on Wednesday night, losing to city rivals Real Madrid in a penalty shootout after winning the second leg 1-0 through Conor Gallagher’s goal, which leveled the aggregate score at 2-2.
The critical moment came during the shootout when Julian Alvarez’s penalty, initially counted as a goal, was disallowed following VAR intervention. Officials determined that Alvarez had made contact with the ball twice – a subtle touch with his left foot before striking with his right after slipping during his run-up.
Why UEFA Limits Full Disclosure of VAR Decisions
Christina Unkel explained on CBS Sports that UEFA faces a “slippery slope” when deciding how much information to release about controversial decisions:
“If you put out information saying here are the angles they’ve decided on, here are the calibration levels, here’s where the kick-point was indicated by the semi-automated technology, this is why the referee makes the decision on X, Y and Z then you get into the slippery slope argument.”
According to Unkel, providing full transparency in one case would create precedent, requiring the same level of disclosure for every disputed call: “If everyone disagrees on an offside situation with a toenail they will demand for that communication and transparency and clarity.”
Official Statement and Technical Clarification
UEFA did provide limited clarification, addressing one specific aspect of the controversy. Contrary to speculation about sensors or specialized technology being used to detect Alvarez’s double touch, journalist Miguel Delaney reported: “UEFA is saying it is just VAR – so using replays – to confirm double touch on a penalty. No sensors used, or other tech.”
This revelation adds an interesting dimension to the debate, as it confirms the decision was made solely through visual replay analysis rather than additional technological aids.
- The penalty was initially awarded and scored
- VAR officials identified a double touch violation
- The decision was made using only video replays, not sensors
- The infringement occurred when Alvarez slipped during his run-up
Atletico Madrid manager Diego Simeone expressed disbelief at the decision, challenging reporters in his press conference: “If anyone from here has seen Julian touch the ball twice, raise your hand. Come on… no? No one?” He further argued that “when he plants his foot and kicks, the ball doesn’t move, even a little bit.”
Despite the controversy, Real Madrid advanced to face Arsenal in the quarter-finals, with the Gunners having convincingly defeated PSV 9-3 on aggregate.
Want to stay updated on the latest football controversies and UEFA Champions League action? Subscribe to our newsletter for expert analysis, exclusive interviews, and breaking news delivered directly to your inbox.